The Obama Administration vs. Political Comedy

This is also posted at Huffington Post.
Is political comedy in trouble? Will there be no funny in the future with an Obama administration? Is Barack Obama bad for comedy?

Disregard all the non-comedians’ fears that Saturday Night Live will go the way of Circuit City. Ignore all the yammers about how Barack Obama is bad for the professionally funny. Forget them all.

These are the same prognosticators who said irony was dead after 9/11. Yes, they said that. The terrorists killed irony. Try even saying that without utilizing sarcasm.

“Where’s the funny in Barack Obama?”, asked the Canadian Press on November 9th. Politico asked the day after the election, “Can ‘The Daily Show‘ survive Barack Obama?” Gawker called the Obama presidency a “Crisis of Comedy”.

So Barack Obama, about to be the most powerful man on the face of the planet, just wiped out all human stupidity? There’s the joke right there.

George W. Bush was bad for comedy. First, he hated dissent. Dubya said that the terrorists on 9/11 were cowards. Bill Maher, noting it was absurd to say that flying yourself into a building was cowardly, said so on television. Maher was fired from single digit channels for pointing that out. Banned to pay cable for eternity. Bush’s then press secretary, Ari Fleischer, told the nation they needed to watch what they say. And people took note – they started watching what they said. Was that good for comedy?

Ron Suskind’s piece in Esquire had a chilling disclosure of the way Bush operates:

According to senior administration officials who learned of the encounter soon after it happened, President Bush looked at the man. “I don’t ever want to hear you use those words in my presence again,” he said. “What words, Mr. President?” “Bad policy,” President Bush said. “If I decide to do it, by definition it’s good policy. I thought you got that.” The adviser was dismissed. The meeting was over.

Questioning Bush was banned within his inner circle and anywhere else it popped up. His dissenters were taken down. Former Ambassador Joseph Wilson wrote an op/ed questioning Bush’s statement in the 2003 State of the Union Address about Iraq’s desire to purchase yellow cake uranium in Africa. Then as a repercussion his wife Valerie Plame was outed as a CIA spy by longtime Karl Rove crony Bob Novack. And thus ended her career. They went after an op/ed author’s wife? Was that good for comedy?

There was a notion among people in the United States that no matter how dumb Bush appeared to be – he was the only one who was going to keep us secure so criticizing him was an affront to our safety. I was touring the country as a stand up during the first Bush term. It was not good for comedy. Bush jokes were not welcomed. Not just in the red states – but in general. He was what everyone was going to the comedy show to escape: the know-nothing boss with your livelihood hanging in the balance of his incompetence.

But it was the fumbling of Hurricane Katrina that broke the levee of criticism. It was just shortly after Bush’s narrow re-election and suddenly ineptitude and cronyism looked like a bad thing. Then it was over. Bush’s number’s never recovered. Congress was lost to the liberals and Bush was a punchline. Every dumb thing he said was a gem. The whole country was waking up from a stupid stupor. And they wanted Bush jokes and they got them. Late night television, comedy clubs, blogs – bathroom stalls – they were everywhere.

Bush was good for comedy for a couple minutes but then he still had three and a half whole years left in office.

Two years after Katrina, George Bush became akin to airline food and Viagra jokes: cliche and overdone. But we were given a gift – the longest presidential campaign in history. A full two years of Bush-free (the Democrats) and Bush-lite (the Republicans). Think of all the Kucinich and Mormon jokes we had. Fred Thompson! Remember Fred Thompson ran for president? His whole campaign was like Darth Vadar sleeping through his alarm, ”Wake up Darth! There are millions of voices crying out in terror that could be suddenly silenced – but you have to wake up!” Tom Tancredo ran for president after saying we should bomb Mecca. Nice foreign policy dude! These guys were gold. There was a candidate named Huckabee, a governor from Arkansas that lived in a triple wide trailer when the governor’s mansion was under construction. Gold!

Currently, as I write this, Bush jokes are stale. Most of the country has forgotten he’s still in power. Last April, I was at a book conference and one of the speakers without realizing it referred to Bush as ‘our former president’. That’s nine months before his term in the White House expired. He’s not good for comedy.

Comedy – or at least political satire – speaks truth to power. It’s much better when that power isn’t tapping your phone without a warrant and suspending habeas corpus.

The Bill of Rights: Good for Comedy.

So relax, don’t believe the hype – political comedy won’t suffer under an Obama Administration. The question is: Will an Obama Administration suffer under political comedy. That’ll test mettle.

 

McCain is Doing Bob Dole’s Material

After Senator Bob Dole lost to President Bill Clinton he went on the Tonight Show and said,”I slept like a baby. Woke up crying every two hours.”

Hysterical. Bob Dole – out of touch and old – but funny.

Last night on the Tonight Show Senator John McCain told Jay Leno, “I’ve been sleeping like a baby – sleep two hours – wake up and cry.”

I guess the secret service and his joke writers took off after he lost.

So…next is Viagra commercials? Since McCain stole Dole’s bit – he should also be subjected to his schtick.

 

Insane in the Middle Name Hussein

This is cross posted at Huffington Post.


The left-wing has to stop being upset about the right-wing using Barack Obama’s full name. Last Monday, there was a Lee County sheriff in Florida introducing Sarah Palin at rally. The event itself was a like pep rally for a losing lineup, chanting about team spirit as the gym crumbles to the ground.

Anyway, the sheriff’s name is Michael Scott. On the video he is a big, effeminate, bald man in uniform, presumably carrying a gun as he says, “On November fourth, let’s leave Barack Hussein Obama wondering what happened.” I watched it wondering when the rest of the Village People were going to chime in.

So cue outrage: Keith Olbermann and Campbell Brown among others have noted that this is not okay to do. Not okay to use that middle name. Brown called it ‘race baiting‘. People at these now infamously raucous and shockingly ignorant rallies are being ignited by the mentioning of Obama’s full name. His middle name is similar to a dictator that the US toppled recently. You may have heard about it a couple years ago. We’ve collectively stopped following the story in recent years. Too much of a bummer. Anyway, it makes news when a viable – ahead in most polls candidate gets called by his full name? That’s political discourse?! News? Notable?

I mean, seriously? His middle name is on his Wikipedia page. How is it an insult? It’s not race baiting. Saying he’s palling around with terrorists is race baiting. And that sound bite gets repeated ad nauseum. The William Ayerserrors more like it – ’story’ is picked up as an actual item instead of the absurdly desperate claim that it is. What doesn’t get noted is that it’s coming from the same people that say Obama is not fit to lead because he lives in the same neighborhood as Louis Farrakhan. Which is like casually mentioning that Obama has been in an airplane just like the one that flew into the Twin Towers on 9/11. Brutal stupidity.

But when it gets discussed by the media – it gets legitimized then it gets further warped in the collective minds of those that don’t get paid to sit around all day and read blogs and newspapers like I do. There’s a YouTube clip of a woman saying Obama has the blood line to be a terrorist. That’s the next step in the blinding rhetoric from the right-wing: Darkies want to kill whiteys. That’s what Jesus said in the bible.

That’s race baiting!

Making fun of Barack Hussein Obama for having a funny name is like making fun of John Sydney McCain for not being able to touch the top of his head. It’s cheap and near sighted. But when air time is given – attention and outrage handed to those that go there it validates it. It makes it look like there is something to the name calling.

Who cares if Obama’s middle name is like a former dictator that we preemptively invaded because our leader wanted to show up his daddy? If anyone should want to forget about Saddam Hussain – it’s the right-wing. They should be the ones embarrassed by what Obama’s middle name conjures up – not the other way around.

This is what the party of Lincoln has been reduced to – name calling? This is what the media has been reduced to – re-acting to name calling? The answer to both is – YES.

Sarah Palin said that she wants to talk directly to the American people without the media filter. Good, let her. Let her talk directly to the American people and let the media actually filter her.

Cats out of the bag: Obama has a funny name. Republicans are becoming parodies of themselves. And the stock market just closed under 9000.

Digg it.

 

Sarah Palin: A Farce To Be Reckoned With

This is also posted at Huffington Post.

In the post-debate, post-partisan, postpartum, postmortem by those that think about stuff, those vilified media types, it was a pretty clear consensus of what happened on that stage in St. Louis last week: Sarah Palin did well because we all know she’s not too bright. It’s like she won a gold medal in the Special Olympics. Yay! She’s a winner! The problem is that she’s been recruited to play in the majors. But she won the gold, doggone it! Somehow she gets extra credit for knowing less than Joe.

It’s disheartening to come out of a two term George Bush era and watch the standards get lowered even further for our political leaders. The Republican Party has been crying sexism since Palin was nominated. But sexism goes both ways. Instead of being held to a higher standard, like Hillary Clinton was, Sarah Palin is applauded for basic motor skills. Yay! She’s a winner! Somehow she also gets extra credit for knowing less than Hillary.

I’ve been describing Sarah Palin as scary stupid. Scary stupid is the kind of stupid where you don’t know enough to know – you don’t know enough.  If you don’t read anything – you have no idea what else you haven’t read. If you don’t spend any time thinking – you never worry about how you’re not spending enough time thinking. Charles Bukowski once said that the worst writers have the least self-doubt. Well, the same can be said for the dumbest politicians.

Great ambition with little intellectual ability: Scary stupid.

Coupled with a bright smile, those Tinkerbell winks and some memorized jabs and you’ve got yourself a farce to be reckoned with.

That’s how she should be treated by the media that annoys her so much: as a lukewarm premise with an even lamer punch line. You know, how we treat all ventriloquist acts. “Oh how cute! She wants more constitutionally granted power than Dick Cheney. You have to read the constitution, finish your verbal moose stew then we’ll see – ‘K peaches?” Yay! She’s a winner!

Why is she being treated as a legitimate candidate? Because she is a right-winger. And right-wingers believe she’s a team player. They say ‘maverick’ with tongue in cheek. They don’t actually want someone that will ‘shake things up’. They want someone that will shake liberals up. Shake up the people they don’t like, appease the one’s they do. They call her a maverick because the words ‘conservative’, ‘republican’ and ‘warhawk’ have been tarnished by conservatives, republicans and warhawks.

True mavericks are not hyped by Republicans. Just ask Ron Paul.

Scary stupid: certain, decisive and dense.

Scary stupid never worries about nuances or facts. They just get in the way of the action. Palin has been going around the country saying that Barack Obama is ‘palling around with terrorists’. This would be a good dig A) if it were true, and B) if she herself were not schtuping a secessionist. Her husband joined a group of Alaskans that wished to secede from the Union, yet she is happy to repeat,” Our opponent … is someone who sees America, it seems, as being so imperfect, imperfect enough, that he’s palling around with terrorists who would target their own country.” She is sleeping with a dude that wanted to take half the land mass away from the US! Serious.

But scary stupid doesn’t care. Hypocrisy doesn’t bother scary stupid. Contradiction doesn’t bother scary stupid. Like Palin’s oft repeated global warming stance: “I’m not one to attribute every man — activity of man to the changes in the climate.” She said at the debate, “There is something to be said also for man’s activities, but also for the cyclical temperature changes on our planet. But there are real changes going on in our climate. And I don’t want to argue about the causes. What I want to argue about is, how are we going to get there to positively affect the impacts?”

I don’t want to argue about the causes, I just want to argue about how to positively affect the impacts? ”I don’t want to talk about evidence. I just want to say words without saying anything.” Scary stupid doesn’t actually like to argue anyway. Scary stupid just likes to be right and take down dissenters…and in Sarah Palin’s case – laughers.

Scary stupid: uninformed but armed.

Okay, okay, we’ve had our fun with the shiny new thing. Now we can see that it can recite lines and wink. That’s great. Legitimate candidates can have press conferences without imploding their running mate’s campaign. Legitimate candidates can be in spin rooms all by themselves. Legitimate candidates can take follow-up questions.

How much lower can we go?

It’s scary stupid to think about.

Spread the word…Digg?

 

Scary Stupid: Palin In The Great History of America

This is cross posted at Huffington Post.

There has been a slow trickle of online clips from Katie Couric’s interview with Sarah Palin. Like water torture they’ve come out night after night. Drip. Drip. Drip. Each progressively more ridiculous than the last. It’s like CBS didn’t want to release the entire interview all at once because we would have thrown up. We needed the time to digest each clip and come to the same realization that Couric must have: Wow. This woman is dim. She’s scary stupid.

Scary stupid is the kind of stupid that beats us up for not being stupid too.

It’s a deadly combo of vehemence and ignorance that we’ve had to endure during the Bush years. Gems like, “That’s George Washington, the first president, of course. The interesting thing about him is that I read three — three or four books about him last year. Isn’t that interesting?” That’s from the leader of the free world: George W. Bush.

Palin, as it turns out – is also a fan of the Founding Fathers. The clip where Couric asks her about how Thomas Jefferson said we needed to build a wall to separate church and state, Palin says, “Thomas  Jefferson also said never underestimate the wisdom of the people.” Of course, put those words into Google and it’s the quote to nowhere. Jefferson never said that. Didn’t believe that.

Jefferson, a brilliant intellectual, statesman and inventor actually said, “Whenever the people are well-informed, they can be trusted with their own government.”  Which is polar opposite of whatever drivel Palin was trying to articulate.

Jefferson talked about the separation of church and state but that didn’t make it into law. It doesn’t say that phrase in the Constitution, but it’s implied in the First Amendment. “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof…” I know this because A) I keep a copy of the Constitution of the United States and the Declaration of Independence in my purse, hoping that when it inevitably gets searched, the government official riffling through my bag sans a warrant will get the irony. And B) because there has been a huge debate about this aspect of the Constitution and the role of religion in public life for the past eight years. You know, since ‘God was in the White House’. You know, since McCreary County, Ky., v. American Civil Liberties Union of Kentucky split the Supreme Court in 2005. You know since the lines of church and state were crossed and lit on fire. Ring any bells?!

How could she have missed that reading all of those newspapers that are put in front of her all these years?!

Of course when Couric asked about cases other than Roe v. Wade that Palin disagreed with, she replied after some hemming and hawing, “There would be others…” But couldn’t recall any specifically.

Scary stupid.

Scary stupid is the kind of stupid where mindless recitation is being ‘at your best’.

She’s like a ventriloquist act – the puppet half. The one’s throwing their voices are her ‘handlers’ like Steve Schmidt. I’ve actually heard people blame ‘her handlers‘ for cramming too much information down her throat and making her choke in interviews. What kind of horrible double standard is that? If a man didn’t know anything about the law or foreign policy and mangled sound bites- he’d be off the ticket – he would have never been considered. But scary stupid has evolved. Just when the public no longer has a tolerance for scary stupid Bush and his not believing science – scary stupid developed auburn highlights and yes, lipstick.

So why is scary stupid bad? Isn’t it time for a ‘Joe six-pack’ to be represented in the vice presidency? Am I such a liberal media elite that I can’t accept someone from outside Washington coming in to ’shake things up’? Am I bias against a ‘team of mavericks’? Am I just being mean to poor little right-wing, public school educated, had to work for a living, power hungry Sarah Palin?

Isn’t it time for someone that doesn’t know a lot about the world or anything really but is a ‘quick study’ to be given world reaching power and influence?

That’s the scary stupid question, isn’t it?

 

 This is cross posted at the Huffington Post.
“History has shown that in times of real trial, elected officials rise to the occasion.” -President George Bush’s address to the nation September 24, 2008.

2008-09-25-624.jpg

John McCain suspended his campaign until an agreement can be reached in Congress about the proposed bailout of the financial system. He issued a statement saying,” We must pass legislation to address this crisis. If we do not, credit will dry up, with devastating consequences for our economy. People will no longer be able to buy homes and their life savings will be at stake. Businesses will not have enough money to pay their employees. If we do not act, ever(sic) corner of our country will be impacted. We cannot allow this to happen.”

Great. Now the economy is getting the same treatment as Terry Schiavo.

Remember that spectacle? It was a matter of life and death in March of 2005. President Bush was bragging and swaggering about his ‘political capital’ after his re-election…as was the rest of the religious right. Terri Schiavo was a woman in a vegetative state induced by her own unfortunate bout with anorexia. Her husband wanted to let her die with dignity. She had already been in a coma for 15 years. Her parents wanted her to stay that way even longer. It was horrible. It was heartbreaking. It was sad. Then the US Government intervened! Then it was really horrible, heartbreaking and sad. The US Government…well, Republicans…more specifically Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, Senator Rick Santorum, and House Majority Leader Tom DeLay held an emergency session of congress to keep this woman alive in the technical sense. In heroic posturing President George Bush flew from his home in Crawford, Texas to Washington DC to sign the bill. All for one poor woman. Months later thousands of poor people would die from lack of government intervention in Hurricane Katrina. But for Terri, government cared on this occasion. They were pro-this-one-life. It was a moment of unwavering buffoonery.

This is a great example of what happens when a group of ’same-thinks’ get too much power. They remind us why ’same-thinks’ should never have too much power. Because they inevitably become a hysterical mob.

Stupidity of that level and caliber doesn’t happen very often. Well… at least it hadn’t happened again (exactly) in the last three years.

But now John McCain is striving for greatness…in folly. He has to show that he’s serious. That he cares. Not that he’s knowledgeable, level-headed or leader-esque. But that he cares about theatrics and stunts. That he can call an emergency session of congress ‘for the good of the country’! That he can suspend his vacation and fly to Washington ‘for the good of the country’! That he can suspend his campaign, cancel the first presidential debate ‘for the good of the country’! Never mind that then sitting president Jimmy Carter and then Governor Ronald Regan debated five days into the Iran Hostage Crisis. Never mind that no crisis up to date has ever been important enough for a presidential candidate not have the time for an audience of millions to hear what they have to say. We live in a post-Terri Schiavo world! Less talk or thought – more action!

Barack Obama, the less experienced of the two candidates, the one ahead in the polls in regards to the economy, said in a press conference a few hours after McCain’s pronouncement, “Part of a president’s job is dealing with more than one thing at once.” Uh yeah. And part of a president’s job is not to be David Blaine constantly doing weird stunts. Where’s the dignity for the elderly statesman?

So lets all hope the economy doesn’t turn out like Terri Schiavo. Ahem. Cough. However, lets hope that for his sensational ploy the voters give John McCain the same treatment as they gave Bill Frist, Rick Santorum and Tom Delay; they were retired – for the good of the country.

 


John McCain announced that he is cancelling the first presidential debate on Friday night so he can work on the economy.
What a tool.

 

Denouncing Extremists While Touting ‘Mavericks’

This is cross posted at Huffington Post.


When I endure a really, really bad movie – I like to watch the director’s commentary on the DVD. I do. It’s my way of looking for an explanation of why total crap is made, marketed and landing in my DVD player. Call it morbid curiosity. In extreme cases – I look for an apology.  “I’m sorry I made this movie and I’m even sorrier that you watched it. Forgive me.”

This is how I watched the Republican National Convention. I sat there night after night looking for someone to say, “Wow. Did we ever leave some children behind or what?” Or, “Sorry about all the looting. Our bad.” Or “When we said ‘God’ was in the White House…yeah we really regret that.” Or “We did misunderestimate George Bush, sorry America.” Or even, “Look, it’s not our fault that Kerry was a dud. Okay? There are some things that are on us – that is not one of them.” Just a little contrition. Something.

Instead, I saw a bunch of white people dressed like bedazzled community cork boards chanting “Drill Baby Drill” reacting enthusiastically to speeches about ‘change’. No, “America is awesome. Everything is great. We’ve been in charge. Yippee” speeches. Change?! Barack Obama was talking about change. He is, after all in the opposing party. So, the Republicans decided that if speaking out against the last 8 years was getting some traction for the Democrats – Republicans should do that too.

The trick is –  talk about change but assume absolutely no responsibility for spurring it. That takes some maneuvering. Cue word play:

“ Change is coming.” McCain said to the sea of cheering supporters during his acceptance speech. The same sea that happily voted for George Bush twice. The same sea that happily had the most powerful executive branch in history. The same sea that’s endured few compromises these past years…which could account for why they are so happy.

Change is coming? Okay, they ruined the word change. Change is change. Changing the change. Not climate change (of course), but change. Sparring change. Sparing change. Change. They’ve muddied the meaning. They’ve run ‘change’ into the ground where it has now lost all significance. Like the surge of patriotism and unity after 9/11; Republicans have warped change. One person’s reformer is another person’s progressive – but still this is ridiculous. McCain used Obama’s exact buzzword?

Does no one at the McCain camp own a thesaurus?!

They have also forever tarnished the word ‘maverick’. Maverick used to be a term for a rebel. For someone that didn’t fit in. Someone that bucked the system. A motherless calf. Madonna started a record label, Maverick records. Madonna is a maverick. Ron Paul is a maverick. Lyndon Larouche is a maverick. My cousin that can’t keep a job because he thinks ‘rules’ are ‘lame, dude’, is a freaking maverick…Man. McCain is a military man and career politician. His version of ‘maverick’ is everyone else’s version of total conformity and doing everything that you’re told.

But the Republicans love to say McCain and his veep choice Sarah Palin are mavericks. They’re mavericks because they said something against their own party. Ooh edgy. They’re critical of politicians. Oh stop you nonconformists. Next they’ll say the system that they’re offering to fix is broken. What won’t you rebel against?!

Besides, the Grand Old Party – the party of traditional marriage, traditional values and traditional skin tones embracing their nominated candidate as a maverick is bizarre anyway. You can’t denounce ‘extremists’ and tout ‘mavericks’. That’s akin to denouncing hoagies while endorsing po-boys. It makes you look nuts.

“We’re going to nominate this guy that we say doesn’t do what we say because we know he shares our values.” Blink.

The Republicans don’t want change. They want to remain in power. Which makes them say anything, including the word ‘change’.

 

The Nixon Library

I went to the Nixon Library in Yorba Linda this weekend because…well, I’m a geek and that’s what geeks and old people do in their spare time – they hang out at libraries on the weekends.

The picture above was in the Vietnam exhibit. There was a television playing Nixon’s ’silent majority’ speech. That image was reflected on the glass over a picture of mass graves.

No further commentary needed.

 

Sarah Palin: The New WMD’s

This piece was also posted on The Huffington Post.


The Grand Old Party has been fervently defending Senator John McCain’s choice for Vice President, first-term Alaska governor Sarah Palin. The spokespeople have been synchronized. And the tactic is instead of answering questions — ask them. And when you ask them — throw in an ‘implication bomb.’

Example inquiry: What experience does she have to be the vice president? Example answer: What experience does Barack Obama have with not raising taxes or saying the national anthem?

I’ll translate: Our candidate is just as under qualified as we have said your candidate is.

Cindy McCain offered George Stephanopoulos on The Week that Palin’s international experience is that she lives close to Russia. “So she knows what’s at stake.” She said. A mighty sound argument that I will use next time someone asks me if I’m a surgeon.  “I live close to a hospital. I know what’s at stake.”

Conservative pundits, columnist Peggy Noonan and Adviser Mike Murphy have been touting McCain’s choice.  “I’m bumping into a lot of critics who do not buy the legitimacy of small town mayorship (Palin had two terms in Wasilla, Alaska, population 9,000 or so).” Wrote Noonan in the Wall Street Journal. “And executive as opposed to legislative experience. But executives, even of small towns, run something.” She offered.

Cheerful. Optimistic. So what if people younger than McCain can die of old age. His proposed replacement ran something. You have to admire someone that will so gleefully defend Sarah Palin. Mike Murphy called her fresh – an ‘anti-politician’. She’s running for something that she…isn’t. Great point.

Then on MSNBC with Chuck Todd it broke. Off camera with mikes still hot Todd asked,”Is she really the most qualified woman?” Without missing a beat Noonan said, “Most qualified? No. I think they went for this, excuse me, political bullshit about narratives.”

“Yeah, they went to narratives.” Said Todd.

Then you can hear Murphy say,”I totally agree.”

My question has always been: do these flacks actually believe all the stuff they say? The answer: Why do you hate democracy and American values?

Then it was clear: these are the same people and tactics that sold the Iraq War. It’s was a combo of brow and drum beating that got us into this trillion dollar ‘vanity project’. “We have to invade them because they have weapons of mass destruction.” Was the basis.

I’m no military genius but you think that if they had weapons of mass destruction they would have used them on us when we invaded them. Not that I’m an expert. The Soviet Union actually had WMDs. They were close to Alaska, so they knew what was at stake (which may be another reason why our war with them was ‘cold’). You don’t invade countries that are heavily armed. That’s why countries get heavily armed – so they won’t get invaded.

This was the most ridiculous, scary, Machiavellian, Orwellian, Barry Levinsonian march to war in recent history. It was sold to the American public by talking heads and columnists that were put on the government payroll. Thousands of young people have died, many more injured and there’s no end in sight. The propaganda posing as talking points, platitudes and patriotic pandering was overwhelming. Through intimidation and repetition we went into a war that makes this nation hemorrhage resources.

And now that same strategy is being used by Steve Schmidt to sell us Sarah Palin, 20-month long governor of a state so small it has more senators than congressmen. He’s gone on the defensive to blame the ‘liberal media’. The same liberal media that McCain used to call his base. The same ‘liberal media’ that went along with anything President Bush wanted to do after 9/11. The same liberal media that is now sexist when it asks questions about Palin’s qualifications.

The question is: will it work? The answer: Do you hate working mothers and apple pie?

 

Fast Company Article

Here’s a link to the article I wrote in next month’s issue of Fast Company.

Fast Company is one of those great magazines where you actually feel smarter after reading it. Not my article exactly. But the other ones. Really great. Ahem.

 

I co-authored a piece that is in the LA Weekly today. My original assignment was a follow-up on the Pico/Olympic story that then was absorbed by a larger story about the MTA.

The story is here.

Thanks for stopping by!

 

The Latest and Greatest…

I got this in an email today:

You look a lot like Portia diRossi, Ellen’s wife. Come to think of it, I haven’t seen you two in a pictures together…. Coincidence? Sure you’re not moonlighting as a lesbian bride?

No. But feel free to continue to pass along that rumor. It could only help my career.

Speaking of which, what have I been up to? Well, I did another piece for the LA Weekly and I’m not quite sure when it’s going to be published. I wrote an article for Fast Company that will be out in September. And it looks like an essay I submitted will be in a book coming out in this Fall or Winter. More than that I can’t say just yet.
However I will be at ComicCon this year, covering it for Mediabistro’s Fishbowl LA. Yay nerds!
 

MSNBC’s Killer Cult

I seem to be getting a lot of traffic from the wikipedia page about the Children of God and I just figured out why – there’s a documentary about it on MSNBC right now.

Anyway, how does one come into this world in a fanatical religious cult and then end up a humorist? I ask, how can you be brought into this world in a fanatical religious cult and NOT end up a humorist? My choices were that or a mental patient. Not that the two are mutually exclusive. And not that there’s anything wrong with being a humorist.
I wrote a press release in case you’re curious.

Cheers.

 
Copyright 2010 tinadupuy.com